I don\u2019t think static descriptions of things actually truly accurate. Yes, they are relevant, and can be useful, but to me things are a complex tapestry of processes where a single thread is a process that is happening at any given time.<\/p>\n
How am I feeling?<\/p>\n
If x, y, z\u2026<\/p>\n
I am feeling approximately y, a process of feeling something between the wider process of x to z.<\/p>\n
Of course this is a simplistic example of a sequence, focusing on one particular feeling, ignoring context, but I wanted to focus on one thread in the tapestry on its own.<\/p>\n
The tapestry may be made of many threads but they are all from the same source. <\/p>\n
The tapestry itself maybe all one thread just very very tangled. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
I don\u2019t think static descriptions of things actually truly accurate. Yes, they are relevant, and can be useful, but to me things are a complex tapestry of processes where a single thread is a process that is happening at any given time. How am I feeling? If x, y, z\u2026 I am feeling approximately y, … Continue reading Probabilistic Processes vs Deterministic Material<\/span>